Good depth 🙂
If you cherished this report and جملات گرامر مجهول (Get the facts) you would like to get more details with regards to تدریس خصوصی زبان انگلیسی; visit my webpage, kindly pay a visit to our internet site.
What was in that sandwich?
He went in, ate a sandwich or some other reviving snack and came out a new man. Can WADA test for cheese and pickle? Will ham and mustard become a banned substance? Maybe after this.
Whatever it was Rory McIlroy did or consumed in the brief time between the end of his first round and the start of his second, he might consider marketing it.
If his golf game ever does collapse as spectacularly as it appeared to at Augusta early on Friday morning, there is a living to be made.
Sadly, while the revival was not too little, it was almost certainly too late. McIlroy’s second round was a blistering reminder of what might have been, but the conclusion of his first may well have scuppered his chances of genuine contention.
Rory McIlory’s first round display in Georgia may have cost him his Masters chances
McIlory improved on Friday with an encouraging 66 but the damage is already done
It’s not the numbers on the board, but the number of wonderful players McIlroy needs to fight his way through.
He needs his second round 66 again — twice. In a nutshell, McIlroy completed Thursday’s round on Friday morning and played as poorly as at any time in his career.
He resumed in a bunker by the 10th green, missed a 10ft uphill putt and it all unravelled from there.
He bogeyed four holes, shot 75 and returned to the clubhouse 10 shots off the lead, tied 78th.
Then he went out and played the same nine again, but as a different golfer. He started from the 10th and was four under par to the turn — a seven shot swing, morning to, well, it wasn’t even afternoon. Morning to late morning, 7am to roughly midday.
It was the most astonishing transformation but that’s probably the problem, too.
McIlroy must be thinking what could have been after improving in Georgia on Friday
Golf is streaky, we know.
A birdie can start a run of them. A duffed tee shot can induce shakes. Yet the greatest maintain an even strain.
McIlroy undoubtedly has the potential to be among the very best golfers. He has been world No1 this year.
He is a Masters away from a personal slam.
But he is as skittish as a squirrel. In headlights. Who has recently mistaken a tube of blue Smarties for his supply of acorns.
At times in adversity, McIlroy seemed unable to distinguish the good shots from the bad.
‘Oh sit, oh sit, oh sit,’ he pleaded with his ball on the first visit to the 15th.
His face was a picture of anguish. Then it pitched and stayed. ‘Perfect,’ he concluded. And then laughed almost sheepishly at his prior concern.
In his second round day, McIlroy seemed unable to distinguish the good shots from the bad
It did not help during those early holes that as poorly as McIlroy was playing, so Dustin Johnson in his group was excelling.
This was what an elite golfer looked like. This was what McIlroy aspired to be. Just four holes into the second round, Johnson hit 10 under and the outright lead.
Yet then he began to give a few back. And as Johnson momentarily faltered, so McIlroy seemed to draw strength from that.
Not just thinking he might make the cut, but that he might prosper from there — maybe even contend by Sunday. But it’s still optimistic.
There are simply too many outstanding golfers between McIlroy and sight of the prize as it stands.
Yet the 180 degree turn in fortune was so exceptional, so extreme, that McIlroy’s champions will no doubt keep the faith.
Eddie Pepperell compared McIlroy to a mail-in vote, arriving late. The swing may be too much to effect this time, however.
Still, it was some watch.
McIlroy went from being so cold his caddie needed to handle his clubs with ice tongs to being the hottest player at Augusta.
McIlory ended up deep in trouble on the 13th hole where he made to make a significant detour
Take your pick. On the 13th, first time, he hit a duck hook left into an unplayable lie and when he finally played his second, couldn’t find a way back over Rae’s Creek that did not entail a significant detour. The camera crew who followed him appeared to be crashing through the undergrowth like escaped gorillas.
On the 16th, a short par three, he hit an eight iron into water in a way that might be described as ‘like a 24 handicapper’.
Except even 24 handicappers would be appalled by this shot.
‘That’s so bad — oh my God,’ said McIlroy. No-one disagreed.
So fast forward and follow McIlroy down the 17th a second time. A gorgeous tee shot to the right of the fairway, a lovely approach shot to 20 feet, a birdie putt.
Beautiful. The golf of a Masters contender.
Yet at that time, McIlroy was still fighting to be in the area come the weekend.
With so many players below par, even at two or three under for the tournament McIlroy remained a single-hole implosion away from the flight home.
And if he overthinks majors as much as he sometimes claims, that thought must have been swirling around in his mind.
McIlroy played some good shots towards the end of the course but it may be too little, too late
What if, what if, what if?
Had McIlroy simply shot level par in that first round, how different the leaderboard could look for him now.
Instead, he was three over on a day when every contender was in serious red.
Unfortunately, that’s probably the Grand Slam gone by for another year, right there.
And he probably does overthink it.
Why, when play was suspended on Thursday night but individuals could finish playing their hole, did he elect for his first shot the next day to be from a greenside bunker?
Once he had struck that past the hole he was scrambling for par, failed, and that set the tone for the early round.
Equally, the same hole kicked off the brilliant round two.
Straight down the Middle East University off the tee, approach shot to 10 feet, birdie putt.
McIlroy’s chances of yet another Major title appear to have vanished for another year
It was the first time he had put the three components of tournament-winning golf together on one hole all morning.
Pity that, by then, he was in a battle just to survive. Still, it is strange how good golf often brings good fortune to the party as its plus one.
Suddenly, McIlroy’s luck changed, too.
On the third, he hit right into the trees, got an almighty kick left and ended up back in the heart of the fairway in front of the green. Yet it was getting harder to make progress.
If his first nine holes had been peppered with birdies, so his second saw a succession of putts flirt with the hole but politely decline.
And every time that happened, McIlroy looked skywards as his chances of making the necessary impression receded. It was a fabulous round but from the boondocks of the leaderboard which, for an elite golfer, is a place of no pressure beyond personal pride.
Maybe there was the secret, even more than that sandwich.
The flashy young owners of a new Sydney restaurant that features a lavish $4 million interior have been accused of not paying staff – for the second time.
Julia Rose Gelonese, 25, and her boyfriend Ussi Monix Da Silva, 27, are already facing action in the Federal Court over allegations they failed to pay staff at their restaurant Upper East Side in Bondi, in Sydney’s east.
The couple were taken to court after an investigation by the Fair Work Ombudsman.
Fair Work alleged that Upper East Side staff – many of whom were on working holiday or student visas – had been underpaid or in some cases received no payment at all.
The court action is still ongoing.
There are now similar claims from workers at new CBD venue MEU in Words Jardim – where Mr Da Silva boasted about spending $4.1 million on a fit out that includes a firepit and waterfall.
According to ASIC documents Ms Gelonese took over from her boyfriend as director of Upper East Side in 2019, while Mr Da Silva controls Meu Jardim.
But both restaurants share the same registered business address according to ASIC.
Julia Rose Gelonese (pictured) and her boyfriend Uzzi Da Silva have been accused of failing to pay staff on time at two restaurants they control in Sydney
But despite allegedly struggling to pay staff, Ms Gelonese and Mr Da Silva (pictured) somehow had the finances to open up a new venue Meu Jardim – and boasted to media about a $4.1 million fit out that includes a firepit and waterfall
‘We’re changing the mould… when you come in it’s like a futuristic oasis.’
Daily Mail Australia can reveal that within just months of opening, staff at Meu Jardim were chasing management for their wages, with many claiming they are still owed superannuation.
Matteo Pellegrino began working at Meu Jardim in January as the restaurant geared up for its grand opening.
The 28-year-old was hired as a supervisor and was initially impressed by the venue, but his attitude quickly changed when he was not paid on time – forcing him to take out a bank loan just to pay his bills.
‘We found out after we had been employed and had been working with them for a while that they had not been paying people over there at the Bondi venue’, Mr Pellegrino said.
‘By the time it opened we’d already got every single one of our pays late. They kept assuring us that once they were opened, once they had revenue: “We’re going to be fine to pay you”.
‘But even still, weeks after we opened they were paying us late.
‘We were meant to be getting paid weekly but it was really once or twice a month, on different dates, and there was just no consistency to it.
‘I had to borrow money after I blew through my savings. (I had to borrow) from a bank and also from my parents.’
Mr Pellegrino said Ms Gelonese and Mr Da Silva would come into the restaurant on a few occasions each week, but barely engaged with staff.
He said the couple seemed more interested in their lavish ‘Instagram lifestyle’ than they were in running a successful business.
‘I just got the impression that they just wanted to have an Instagram lifestyle and thought that maybe by opening a fancy restaurant they could do that,’ Mr Pellegrino said.
‘There was this guy that they said was a secret investor. He was funding the whole thing essentially, I’m not sure why.’
Matteo Pellegrino began working at Meu Jardim in January and told Daily Mail Australia he was regularly paid late
‘Other (restaurants) are going for rustic looks; we’re changing the mould,’ Mr Da Silva bragged to Broadsheet magazine earlier this year
Intended to look like a glacier, the venue cost $4.1 million to fit out and includes a waterfall and firepit
Other staff members who worked at Meu Jardim had similar experiences.
One man, who did not want to be named, said he was also consistently paid late.
‘The first time I had concerns was when the first payslip didn’t arrive in the first week of March,’ the bar worker said.
‘The funds for payslip one were never actually paid into my nominated bank account until the 16th of March.
‘Pre-COVID, Ussi and Julia both frequented the venue quite often, especially around opening night in February. Ussi was in almost every weekend.
‘Every night Ussi was in, he would ask for rounds of shots, which we were directed to charge to the business.
‘They were definitely living the lavish lifestyle while in the venue. Post-COVID, I never saw Julia at the venue but Ussi still came in fairly regularly.’
A former staff member at the couple’s other restaurant Upper East Side shared text messages showing just how employees were allegedly strung along.
Esty Reyes was told by Ms Gelonese that her wage would be in her bank balance ‘by Friday’ – February 21.
On several occasions in the weeks that followed, the businesswoman claimed she would send Ms Reyes a ‘payslip’ by the end of the day.
But when money had not arrived by March 25 – more than a month later – Ms Gelonese finally admitted there was a problem.
‘Right now there’s no revenue coming in so it’s extremely hard to finalise anything at this present time,’ her text read.
‘As mentioned, I’m waiting for some funds to come in so I can finalise.’
Ms Gelonese next told Ms Reyes the money would be in her bank account by April 6.
But it was not until July – five months after she was first due to be paid – that the bank transaction finally went through.
By this stage COVID-19 restrictions had forced the lockdown of many businesses and left Ms Reyes out of work and out of money.
‘I tried to be patient, but then everything closed and I was trying to survive,’ she said.
‘I offered (for them) to even only pay me half. They finally paid me five months late at which point I was already in Mexico and only after I raised my voice.
‘I just couldn’t believe this situation happened in Australia.’
Esty Reyes, a former employee at Upper East Side, said she was not paid on time
The United Workers Union told Daily Mail Australia the underpayment of staff at the two Sydney venues was concerning
Text exchanges between Ms Gelonese and a former employee show complaints about not being paid began in February and stretched on for months
After complaints by several Upper East Side staff members, the Ombudsman began an investigation and found they had likely breached 11 areas of the restaurant award and two of the national employment standards.
When Ms Gelonese did not meet the Fair Work Ombudsman’s compliance deadline, the case was taken before the Federal Court.
In a statement, Sandra Parker of the Fair Work Ombudsman said that in the wake of major cases of underpayment by celebrity chefs including George Colambaris and Neil Perry, they were ‘cracking down’ on the hospitality industry.
‘Under the Fair Work Act, inspectors can issue a Compliance Notice if they form a belief that an employer has breached certain workplace laws,’ Ms Parker said.
‘Where employers do not comply with our notices, a court can order them to pay penalties in addition to back-paying any affected employees.
‘The Fair Work Ombudsman is cracking down on alleged underpayments in the fast food, restaurant and café sector, particularly when it involves migrant workers.’
Wage theft was last week criminalised in Queensland, which followed Victoria’s lead from earlier this year, however New South Wales is yet to do the same.
Karma Lord, director of Hospo Voice the hospitality arm of the United Workers Union, slammed the restaurant she called an ‘Instagram playground for rich and famous’.
‘What does it say about the NSW hospitality industry that an employer who doesn’t pay its workers at one venue, who has been prosecuted by the Ombudsman for wage theft, can go on to spend millions opening another sumptuous venue?’ she said.
Ms Gelonese took over directorship of Upper East Side from her boyfriend Mr Da Silva (above) with the action taken against them by the Fair Work Ombudsman remaining before the courts
Much like its sister venue in the city, Upper East Side is decked out in style with thousands of fairylights covering the roof
Since opening in 2017 the bar has become popular among reality TV stars such as Sam Frost (back row, second from right)
‘Workers shared with us the horror and anxiety of working in this Instagram playground for the rich and famous, while going months without being paid and having to beg for their wages.’
Ms Gelonese claimed that despite the two businesses sharing a registered address, she was only affiliated with Upper East Side – not Meu Jardim.
Mr Da Silva has been contacted for comment.
Upper East Side had previously been taken to court for running up massive debts of more than $95,000 to businesses who had provided food, alcohol and services.
The businesses pursing the bar included Roxy Jacenko’s prominent PR firm Sweaty Betty, which was owed $10,102.
One outstanding bill from a labour hire company was for $36,745 to JRM Hospitality.
Roxy Jacenko (pictured) and her firm PR Sweaty Betty provided services for Upper East Side worth $10,102
It was understood JRM was engaged by the bar to employ staff after a number of chefs and other staff walked off the job suddenly in mid-2017.
Ms Gelonese has previously told Daily Mail Australia that all payments to her employees at Upper East Side had now been ‘finalised’.
In addition to paying her staff, Ms Gelonese claimed the debts owed to a number of businesses had also been settled.
The pandemic has caused major disruption for many restaurants and bars, with many unable to open and forced to close because of government lockdowns.